Skip to main content
MAPI... leading manufacturers with business knowledge and research MAPI : Exchanging Business Expertise
Go Search
Information for Manufacturers
Who We Are
Membership
News Center
Publications
Meetings
Login
  
Other Blogs
MAPI Council Blog
Information for Manufacturers > News Center > News > Categories
MAPI Analysis on ISM Index:  Manufacturing Continues to Outperform General Economy
The following is an analysis from Daniel J. Meckstroth, Ph.D., Chief Economist for the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, regarding the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Index for August 2010.  The ISM Index was 56.3 percent, an 0.8 percentage point improvement over July 2010:
 
“Manufacturing has consistently outperformed the pace of growth in the general economy during this recovery,” he said.  “For example, GDP increased only at a 1.6 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2010 but manufacturing industrial production expanded at a 7.9 percent rate.  Amidst evidence that the general economy is slowing to a crawl, this report indicates that manufacturing activity continues to grow at a healthy pace.  Industrial firms are building inventories that were depleted during the recession and exports are surging in machinery and equipment and material industries. 
 
“The strong growth in manufacturing production is partly catch up for a substantially more severe recession in the industry than the overall economy,” he added.  “Also, the depth and length of the previous downturn built pent up demand for replacing big ticket consumer goods and repair and replacement in business.  We expect manufacturing production to decelerate in the near term but still grow faster than overall GDP.”
MAPI Analysis on Durable Goods:  ‘Disappointing’ Report and Rough Month
The following is an analysis from Daniel J. Meckstroth, Ph.D., Chief Economist for the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, regarding the durable goods report for July 2010:
 
“The advance durable goods report for July is disappointing, like most other statistics reported for last month,” he said.  “Although total durable goods orders increased 0.3 percent, when transportation equipment orders are removed, orders fell 3.8 percent.  A very large gain in new orders for civilian aircraft in July accounted for more than all the gain.  Major declines in new orders for machinery, computer, and electrical equipment (including appliances) were disappointing.  A primary indicator of equipment expenditures is nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft.  New orders for this segment fell 8 percent in July, wiping out previous gains in May and June.  Nevertheless, thanks to a fast start to the year, the indicator’s cumulative orders are almost 16 percent above year ago levels in the first seven months of 2010.
 
“Statistical evidence for July clearly show that the U.S. economy is decelerating in its pace of growth,” he added.  “Business spending continues to grow at a faster rate than the overall economy due to strong profitability and excessive capital spending restraint during the recession.  With the initial return to growth, aided by an inventory swing, there was immediate need for repair and replacement equipment.  Now that it seems clear that the recovery is moving at a slow and uneven pace, the need for equipment is less pressing and the impetus for growth switches to one of enhancing productivity to cut costs.”
MAPI Analysis on Industrial Production: Strong Factory Sector Sidesteps Shaky Overall Economic Recovery
The following is an analysis from Cliff Waldman, Economist for the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, regarding the industrial production report for July 2010:
 
“While signs of slowing in both the general economy and in manufacturing have become apparent in recent months, the industrial production report for July shows that the shaky U.S. economic recovery has yet to fully impede the strong factory sector rebound,” Waldman said “The 1 percent increase in total industrial production for July was powered by a 1.1 percent increase in manufacturing output after a 0.5 percent contraction in June.  The July output gain was given a sharp boost by nearly 9 percent growth in automotive product output, partially a result of dealer incentives and modest improvement in financing conditions.   Industry data beyond the often volatile auto sector are reflective of the current dissonance between strong capital spending and weak consumer spending. 

“Output growth in the broad business equipment category showed a gain of 1.8 percent powered by 1.1 percent growth in information processing equipment output,” he added, “but consumer non-durable production activity was flat, with significant contractions in such essential industries as food and clothing.  As the fiscal stimulus fades and the sizable inventory adjustment moderates, the weakness in key categories of demand, particularly consumer spending and residential investment, has made prospects for continued economic recovery especially uncertain.

“ If U.S. and global economic growth slips below the pace needed for at least moderate job growth and sustainable demand then the strong factory sector recovery in the U.S. will certainly slow,” he concluded, “impacting many key trading partners in North America and elsewhere whose economic prospects are, to some extent, tied to U.S. manufacturing.”
MAPI Report Offers Insight on “Buy American” Guidelines
A Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI legal analysis and regulations report clarifies much of the “Buy American” requirements of public works projects funded by the recent stimulus bill.  Rules for Stimulus “Buy American” Provisions Issued (LAR-498e) addresses the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) which includes provisions for the funding of public buildings and public works projects.  By Congressional design, federal stimulus dollars come with “Buy American” requirements attached, including the stipulation that all the “iron, steel, and manufactured goods” used in the project must be made in the United States, subject to international trade agreements.
 
While Congress described its “Buy American” preferences broadly, the rules as published essentially limit the “Buy American” restrictions to “construction materials.”  This narrower application requires materials used in the construction of a public work to be American-made, but allows equipment and tools used in the projects, as well as other manufactured goods to have foreign components as long as the final product is manufactured in the United States.  There are certain exceptions to the requirements, notably, for foreign suppliers with which the U.S. has a trade agreement in government procurement, and for instances in which the requirements would add excessive costs to the project.
 
The MAPI report details the requirements for both federal and sub-federal projects, and offers a useful table comparing the 1933 Buy American Act provisions with the two stimulus-funded “Buy American” rules.
Duesterberg: Stimulus Plan Also Needs Exit Strategy
In his March 2009 column in Industry Week, Thomas J. Duesterberg, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, writes that while an economic stimulus plan is necesary, so too is a return to fiscal sanity, sooner rather than later, lest the ability of U.S. business to invest and innovate become stymied.
 
 
U.S. Needs Bold New Strategy To Advance Global Trade Objectives

The Obama Administration, in response to the stalemate of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations, has the opportunity to embark upon a new and more effective trade strategy with significant advantages for both industrialized and emerging market nations, according to a new Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI policy review, entitled A New Trade Strategy: From Here to Multilateral Free Trade.

 

Ernest Preeg, Senior Fellow in Trade and Productivity and report author, assesses the existing Doha Round negotiations as no longer in the U.S. interest, principally because newly industrialized nations, including China, India, and Brazil, are largely exempt from reciprocal reductions in import barriers.

 

A new trade strategy is then proposed which would consolidate the now more than 400 bilateral free trade and other preferential agreements into a multilateral free trade agreement for nonagricultural trade, in parallel with agreements for substantial and more balanced trade liberalization for agriculture and services.  Preeg characterizes this strategy as “bold and forward looking,” while “politically feasible and in the mutual interest of all principal participants.”

 

He concludes the report:  “It is decision time for trade strategy.  A Chinese proverb warns that ‘many a false step is taken by standing still.’  This could well be the outcome for U.S. trade policy over the next couple of years.  Far better would be to reassert a leadership role for multilateral free trade.”

The Competitive Edge -- Looking Ahead to Manufacturing's Future
by Thomas J. Duesterberg
as published in Industryweek.com
 
A few years ago I co-authored a book taking a look at the next 200 years of human history. Despite the dangers of forecasting, it is useful from time to time to look ahead, if only 10 or 20 years. Manufacturing is after all a business that requires making large bets on future trends.

In short, I think demographic, economic and political trends will continue in coming decades to provide a favorable outlook for U.S.-based manufacturing. The growth of the world population sets the stage for continued economic expansion. The United Nations predicts that world population will grow by 28% by 2030 and a total of 40% by 2050, when it reaches nearly 9.2 billion.

Economic dynamism, moreover, is rapidly expanding the incomes and wealth of people around the world. Researchers at Goldman Sachs estimate that by 2030 two billion people will be added to the rolls of the middle class, defined as having incomes between $6,000 and $30,000 in purchasing power. Most of the new middle class will reside in China, India and newly emerging economic powers such as Brazil, South Africa, Vietnam, Russia and Indonesia.

As 70-80 million people are added to the rolls of the middle classes each year, the demand for manufactured goods will expand in tandem. The Goldman study, for example, puts the "sweet spot" for purchase of higher-end durables at about $8,000-$9,000 in annual income. U.S. manufacturers are highly competitive already in this category of goods, having seen over 30% growth in exports in the last three years.

On the global political economy front, trends are favoring domestic U.S. manufacturers in other ways. The shift in the value of the dollar relative to other major currencies reduces some of the disadvantages that U.S. firms faced in the past two decades. This trend is strengthened by the rise in wages in emerging economies, especially in Asia.

Will these trends, particularly the weaker dollar, continue? The still-sizable U.S. current account deficit helps weaken enthusiasm for holding dollar-based assets. The current financial crisis also contributes to this trend. In the United States, the decades-long credit bubble, which drove consumption-led growth, is at an end or at least facing a major contraction. Elsewhere, growing incomes and macroeconomic strength in the emerging economies strengthen both their purchasing power and their currencies. Domestic inflation in China and India also will have to be addressed, partly by appreciation of their currencies. In sum, growth in the United States will have to be led by exports and capital investment and growth abroad more by consumption, in turn leading to a rebalancing of global trade.

A final structural change should also help to strengthen domestic U.S. manufacturing. The startling, and long-term, rise in global energy prices is raising transportation costs to the point that local production of goods will be favored. This is already apparent in commodity goods, but is affecting higher value added products like automobiles as well. Growing foreign direct investment in the United States is another indicator of this trend.

All of these factors are working in the direction of enhancing domestic U.S. manufacturing over the coming decade or two. Maintaining the momentum will require continued deployment of America's ingenuity, capital investment and flexibility to meet the challenge of progressively sophisticated foreign competition. A bit of help from U.S. policymakers, in the form of lower corporate taxes, or even moving to consumption-based taxes, more free trade agreements, and reducing the structural cost burdens, such as our employer-based health care system and tort liability, would also contribute to this favorable trend.

U.S. goods exports are up a strong 18% this year, but to recapture market share lost in the last two decades will require these trends to last into the next two.

MAPI's Preeg: China's Technological Advances Moving "Steadily Forward"

Ernest Preeg, Ph.D., Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI Senior Fellow in Trade and Productivity, recently testified before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission on technological advances in six key industries in China: aerospace, nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and telecommunications, automotive and pharmaceuticals.

"Technological advances in terms of development, production, and exports are moving steadily forward," in all of the sectors, he said.

Among his more specific findings, Preeg noted that China is devoting large resources to develop advanced technology aerospace programs with extensive overlap between commercial and military objectives; China has been investing heavily in nanotechnology and already leads the United States in some areas; and Chinese development and innovation in the pharmaceutical sector has been expanding rapidly, principally through collaboration between Chinese and foreign firms.